0 thoughts on “Earthquake prediction?

  1. This is good news, albeit weird news. I sometimes wonder why more of the scientific community isn’t dedicated to finding the answers to things like this, rather than dripping marmite into cats’ eyes.

  2. I think there are quite a few boffins out there trying to find a way of predicting earthquakes, but it’s basically just too random. Another factoid I found out while reading the papers recently (or possibly the BBC website) is that there is apparently a rogue 25km thick chunk of continental plate right beneath Tokyo that could end up causing all kinds of trouble – or not, as the case may be.

  3. There are actually large groups of scientists, as Muzuhashi rightyl suspects, that look into earth quake prediction, and there is also the scientific infrastructure to support this, i.e. large computing grids that provide the processing power for what is not an easy task. Indirectly, I work with some of them, and also with people who look into things such as flood predictions. That seems to be easier, relatively speaking.

  4. If your computing pals happen to find out when and where the next big one is going to hit, be sure to let me know!

  5. I would, but we usually communicate via quarterly reports, so when I read the “achievements” sections it could just read: “Last month we predicted…” At least you would then know that they were right when you start rebuilding the house…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *